<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law School Fool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:29:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='lawschoolfool.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

			<item>
		<title>Oppenheim v. Long Island R. Co.</title>
		<link>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/oppenheim-long-island-r-co/</link>
		<comments>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/oppenheim-long-island-r-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law School Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law from LawSchoolFool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Railroad Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 103 motion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a motion pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike the &#8216;First Separate and Complete Defense&#8217; and the &#8216;Second Separate and Complete Defense&#8217; in defendant&#8217;s answer on the ground that the matter contained therein is frivolous, irrelevant, redundant, unnecessary, impertinent, or scandalous and may tend to prejudice, embarrass or [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=lawschoolfool.wordpress.com&blog=5195889&post=145&subd=lawschoolfool&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/oppenheim-long-island-r-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Law School Fool</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nash v. Board of Ed. of City of New York</title>
		<link>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/nash-board-education-new-york/</link>
		<comments>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/nash-board-education-new-york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law School Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law from LawSchoolFool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation under Feinberg Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Albany County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspended without pay 1955]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Petitioners move pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for the immediate reinstatement in their positions as school teachers in the New York City Public School System from which they were suspended without pay in September 1955 and for the dismissal of certain charges now pending against them.
Petitioners are honorably discharged members of [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=lawschoolfool.wordpress.com&blog=5195889&post=143&subd=lawschoolfool&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/nash-board-education-new-york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Law School Fool</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>People v. Roberts</title>
		<link>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/people-v-roberts/</link>
		<comments>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/people-v-roberts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law School Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law from LawSchoolFool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1955 trial testimony transcript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo City Court Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a motion by defendant to obtain a copy of the transcript of testimony taken at his trial in 1955 free of charge.
The court heretofore denied the informal application made by letter upon the basis of People v. Brown. Defendant has renewed his application upon a claim of poverty, citing Griffin v. People of [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=lawschoolfool.wordpress.com&blog=5195889&post=140&subd=lawschoolfool&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2009/01/01/people-v-roberts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Law School Fool</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gallenstein Testified to Competence as Salesman</title>
		<link>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/31/gallenstein-testified/</link>
		<comments>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/31/gallenstein-testified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law School Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law by Law School Fool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law from LawSchoolFool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaintiff testified regarding sobriety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railway mail clerk Gallenstein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The witness Gallenstein, now a Railway Mail Clerk, a fellow worker with decedent up to the time of his death, seeing him every day, testified testator was the best salesman the Company ever had, and he had declared to him on three or four occasions that his first wife and boys had taken his fruit [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=lawschoolfool.wordpress.com&blog=5195889&post=138&subd=lawschoolfool&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/31/gallenstein-testified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Law School Fool</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Los Angeles Seeks Injunction against Superior Court in Baseball Litigation</title>
		<link>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/los-angeles-injunction-court-baseball-litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/los-angeles-injunction-court-baseball-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law School Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law by Law School Fool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law from LawSchoolFool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles baseball litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By this proceeding in prohibition the city of Los Angeles seeks to restrain the superior court from enforcing a preliminary injunction or taking further action in a taxpayer&#8217;s suit to enjoin certification of the result of a referendum election.
The city council adopted an ordinance authorizing execution of a contract between the city and the Brooklyn [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=lawschoolfool.wordpress.com&blog=5195889&post=128&subd=lawschoolfool&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/los-angeles-injunction-court-baseball-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Law School Fool</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cahan Rules for Dismissing Case Due to Unlawfully Obtained Evidence</title>
		<link>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/cahan-case-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/cahan-case-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law School Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law by Law School Fool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law from LawSchoolFool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal Court of Los Angeles Judicial District in Case 143900]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Respondent has filed a motion to augment the record herein by adding thereto the minutes of the Municipal Court of Los Angeles Judicial District in Case No. 143900 entitled People of the State of California v. Henry Victor Prewitt, and to further add to the record on appeal a certified copy of the complaint filed [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=lawschoolfool.wordpress.com&blog=5195889&post=125&subd=lawschoolfool&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/cahan-case-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Law School Fool</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>People v. Contreras</title>
		<link>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/people-v-contreras/</link>
		<comments>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/people-v-contreras/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law School Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law by Law School Fool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law from LawSchoolFool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contreras convicted for selling heroin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A jury found defendant guilty of selling heroin in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11500. He appeals from the judgment of conviction, claiming that the trial court erred in failing to give an instruction on circumstantial evidence and an instruction on reasonable doubt.
The facts, which are not in dispute, are as follows: On [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=lawschoolfool.wordpress.com&blog=5195889&post=122&subd=lawschoolfool&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/people-v-contreras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Law School Fool</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Krouzian v. Hagopian</title>
		<link>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/krouzian-v-hagopian/</link>
		<comments>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/krouzian-v-hagopian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law School Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law by Law School Fool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law from LawSchoolFool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conclusions of law and judgment reached in Krouzian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a trial on April 26, 1957, the trial judge on May 8 signed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and on May 9 signed and had entered a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $200 (based on plaintiff&#8217;s second cause of action), in favor of defendant on plaintiff&#8217;s first cause of action, and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=lawschoolfool.wordpress.com&blog=5195889&post=120&subd=lawschoolfool&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/krouzian-v-hagopian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Law School Fool</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>C. F. Bolster Co. v. J. C. Boespflug Const. Co.</title>
		<link>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/bolster-co-v-boespflug/</link>
		<comments>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/bolster-co-v-boespflug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law School Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law by Law School Fool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law from LawSchoolFool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue of construction law in Bolster trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the court below plaintiff, C. F. Bolster Co., a contractor, recovered judgment against defendant, J. C. Boespflug Construction Company, the general contractor, and The Travelers Indemnity Company, its surety, for extra work allegedly done by plaintiff at defendant contractor&#8217;s direction in the construction of certain school buildings for the Los Angeles City High School [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=lawschoolfool.wordpress.com&blog=5195889&post=117&subd=lawschoolfool&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/bolster-co-v-boespflug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Law School Fool</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penson &#8211; Valid Arrest Based on Information from Informant Permitted</title>
		<link>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/penson-valid-arrest-informant/</link>
		<comments>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/penson-valid-arrest-informant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law School Fool</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Law by Law School Fool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Law from LawSchoolFool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valid arrest in Penson based on informant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the case of People v. Penson, it was held that a valid arrest may be made solely by reason of information communicated by a reliable informant as above defined herein. In the case just cited, the court stated: &#8216;The officers&#8217; appraisal of the informant&#8217;s reliability was based upon the truthfulness of prior reports from [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=lawschoolfool.wordpress.com&blog=5195889&post=107&subd=lawschoolfool&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawschoolfool.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/penson-valid-arrest-informant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Law School Fool</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>